· Columns · Essays · Links · News · Feeds · Tunes

February 25, 2004

Boy, if only Stevie Cameron were around to expose this scandal

Stevie Cameron, author of On the Take and other obsessive-compulsive disorders, has confessed to being an RCMP informant. Well, no: she has, says the Globe, "admitted [to] being the confidential informant whose identity was protected by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in the Eurocopter helicopter-procurement case." How are those different statements? According to Cameron, while the RCMP considered her a confidential informant � to the extent of blacking out her name in court documents � she did not consider herself to be. "You think you're off the record � but when somebody decides for whatever reason to put you down as a confidential informant, you don't know about it." Or maybe it depends on what the meaning of "informant" is:
Ms. Cameron said that until a few weeks ago, she was unaware of the exact definition of a confidential informant. "What I have done is told the police I am not a confidential informant, and they shouldn't be acting as if I am," she said. "I wasn't coded, and I wasn't paid.
Still, we're a long way from "horseshit," aren't we? This is serious stuff. It goes without saying that journalists should not be in the business of spying for the police: it compromises their independence, and exposes other journalists to suspicion. But whether or not she was an informant, Cameron clearly crossed some sort of line, so consumed had she become by her story, even flying to Germany at one point to deliver evidence to prosecutors in a related proceeding. According to RCMP affidavits, the informant whose name they were protecting refused to testify "unless it was for the purpose of the prosecution of Brian Mulroney." But it's worse than that. Much of the "evidence" the police had to suspect Mulroney of taking kickbacks in the Airbus affair was, as we later discovered, furnished by journalists. And the RCMP officer in charge of the investigation, Sgt. Fiegenwald, was forced to step down for leaking confidential information to a journalist � Stevie Cameron. The picture emerges of a recombinant loop of conspiracy theorizing, journalist to policeman and back, each feeding off the other and, it appears, little else. That would be bad enough � but in a case accusing the former Prime Minister of Canada of taking bribes? (Mulroney, it must be said, has not helped his case, admitting recently that he did business with Karlheinz Schreiber, the man alleged to have offered the kickbacks, after he stepped down as PM � a fact he neglected to acknowledge at the time he was suing the government.) I'd say Cameron's career was over, except this is Canada, and her kind of stuff always has a market. She'll probably write a book about her experiences. They could call it On the Sly.
Links to this post:

12 Comments

Anonymous Anonymous:

Coyne - and if I am reponding to someone else's post, they should be working for the media - they are sufficiently off-base!

So much for journistic solidarity - I thought it was the Airbus Scandal, not choppers - when did that change?

As for the RCMP - you mean the bunch who took part in money-laundering in Adscam and raiding their own pension fund for $3.1 million - having handed Harper the last election.

Now your collegial pussies in the Press Gallery are being managed the same way that the Kennedys managed your American colleagues -- Clinton said "I don't need you guys - I have Larry King". So they got rid of a President who liked oral sex for one who is a war monger and is bankrupting the country. I'll take sex over death any time thank-you!

Journalists who live in glass houses should not through stones. I don't know Cameron. She wasn't polite enough to reply when I tried to reach her.

In getting both sides of a story, it is never easy not to be a reverse conduit of information - as any reporter who has done anything other than re-write news releases and wire stories knows. Have you ever done any real reporting?

Is Harper wiling to take a new look at this case: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2007/03/22/schreiber-inquiry.html

"The Harper government has reneged on past demands by two of its own ministers to hold an inquiry into the so-called Airbus affair because it is "scared" of potential revelations, German-Canadian businessman Karlheinz Schreiber has charged during an interview with CBC News."

In 1998, Peter MacKay,now minister of foreign affairs, rose in the House, asking when Jean Chretien's Liberal government would "clear the air on this sordid affair" by calling such an inquiry.

"I have to ask the question: What is the government afraid of? If the prime minister and his government really cared for this country, and the reputation of fairness and democracy, they would themselves call for a public inquiry and present themselves as witnesses."

Schreiber said he would be willing to testify at a public inquiry.

If Schreiber is afraid to be extradited to Germany - where he would be found guilty - as is claimed - then - how can there have been nobody in Canada guilty of what he stands acccused of in the EU. If he is guilty of kickbacks - where did they go?

I saw Cameron interviewd on one talk show in detail - one - she told of how she had been hounded from her job, threatened in Montreal (as were her husband and child)and abused by the RCMP - "the RCMP considered her a confidential informant to the extent of blacking out her name in court documents; she did not consider herself to be."

Since when do they disclose the names of informants - isn't that what Bush's boys just did to a CIA agent - and isn't that dispicable?

Journalists took the word of the RCMP over a fellow journalist and hung her out to dry - while our German friend is afraid of jail in Germany - but like Black and hus ilk - from Bre-X to Hollinger to the Mutal Fund fiasco to the royalty trust "crash and burns" - know they will never have to worry about that here in the banana republic (Black was investigated by the RCMP and they found no ground for action???).

Concentrated media ownership, cowered reporters, corrupt police if the Auditor General is to be believed and an endless series of scandles that show a total collapse of our moral, ethical and legal framework. And we huff and puff when Muslims say the West is decadent and corrupt?!

I hate to tell you young bucks and does - but as an old war horse who worked in the business and in Ottawa - you are so far outside the circle and so removed from access to truth about anything (or you are blind, deaf and dumb cowards)that you should at least lay off Stevie.

Did it ever occur that they might be getting a pesky reporter off their backs at the requiest of their political masters - or didn't you know the RCMP was politicized?

The Commissioner has the status (ironic term to use but there it is) of a Deputy Minister. If you think Zac was fired over Arrar, you have been reading too many news releases. Sampson was tortured; I have seen others who have been tortured; Arrar - the price of a block "immigrant" vote - shows NO signs of torture.

The only reporters around these days with "chops" are female; they are considered niave by their male confreres - maybe they are - but they pay the price, males are not prepared to pay.

And the public is dumbed down, numbed out or just doesn't care - as Canada developes a growing international repution for being the most corrupt bush league back water in the West - and you think this is Stevie Cameron's fault - and you believe the RCMP when they say she was an informer (or when they say anything else)?

I left the busines in disgust. Many of my age group did. We watch you to whom the torch was passed trash the profession, buckle under to political, economis and legal pressure (SLAPP suits) every day, and we cringe.

I have told Harper and his senior Ministers that the next few months time is about more than winning or losing an election; it is about winning or losing a country. If we don't get a grip soon,it will be too late.

I suspect Stevie was not "liked" by her colleagues, but she laid it on the line. Since her public destruction, you have all hidden under your desks like wimps.Of course, she has to be trashed or ignored - otherwise you would have to look at yourselves in the mirror and ask why - if you are doing your job - you have not become a target.

Trust me - if you do - you will.

It used to come with the territory and we used to fight back, not role over and play dead.

I was aked to pick an anonymous ID - to hell with that - people should have the character to identify themselves - that's what I have about blogs and lists.Too many gutles wonders and provayeurs hiding their faces and destroying the intergity in the Internet - the technology we hoped might put the information managers out of business. But, stupid they aren't. UIncreasingly, the Net is being turned into a medium od disinformation too.

Jim Roache (ex CBC, CRTC, Communications Director)

3/23/2007  
Blogger langmann:

@ Jim Roache:

You worked for the CBC. When it comes to non-credibility that pretty much says it all.

If Coyne wants to do some appropriate navel gazing when it comes to the sorry state of the profession, it's entirely appropriate. And warranted.

Don't let the asteroid hit you on your way out to extinction.

C. Langmann MD PhD

11/13/2007  
Anonymous Anonymous:

Jim Roache,

As far as rants go, not bad, even if you can't spell. Heck, you even managed to slip in a slur and a falsehood against President Bush's administration! (Richard Armitage, who "outed" Valerie Plame to reporter Bob Novak was not one of "Bush's boys", but let's not confuse boring facts with juicy innuendo, eh?)

I can appreciate your perspective since you claim to be a CBC veteran, but I certainly hope you weren't making serious policy decisions at the CRTC, or at least, that you weren't ranting when you were.

Now, please tell us next about how Sept. 11, 2001 was an inside job.

11/13/2007  
Anonymous ron in kelowna:

Roache; "I was aked to pick an anonymous ID .. "

True to form, a true CBCer can spin anything. ANYTHING !!

Andrew simply gives commenters the option of remaining anonymous or not. He asked nothing.

The reason some wish to remain anonymous is the danger of being hounded by the out-of-control propaganda media snake pit. Especially the PPG.

As demonstrated Mr Roache.

11/13/2007  
Anonymous rebarbarian:

Mr. Roache: Canada is not the most corrupt bush league nation in the west. Not even close.

11/13/2007  
Anonymous Saskboy:

I almost wish I was old enough to remember the Brian Mulroney years. But all I can remember from government policy are watching stores close a day or more to relabel for the GST.

11/13/2007  
Blogger Joe Green:

I for one very much appreciated Jim Roache's post, as well as his past work.

As far as politically motivated liars are concerned, I place Stockwell Day and his right wing neocon sidekicks at the top of the hit parade. You see, these guys are PROVEN LIARS in Court, and have been successfully sued for their lies.

I also tend to trust the CBC and the BBC more than any other news media for my news reports. In particular I remember some of the CBC reporting during the Viet Nam War that painted a very different picture from the Pentagon version that was being pumped out of Washington by the corporate elites that had a vested interest in the murder and mayhem of war.

Its no different today in Iraq. This is really The Second Viet Nam War, and those perpetrating it against civilians,women and children are no different then those killers that did the same during the First Viet Nam War.

Listening to some of the debate in Canada on the media, and Harper's little temper tantrums reminds me of what people used to say in the former Soviet Union.

"The real news is what they (the party) do not say". Its all there between the lines."

The real news between the lines with this "Mulroney Inquiry" is what the Harper Government is not saying. And what they are NOT talking about is "free trade" that has crippled the Canadian Economy while the Mulroney "neocons" were raping the treasury.

I close by saying that I trust Stevie Cameron, and I trust Linda McQuaig. I trust Brian Stewart of the CBC and I even trust Lou Dobbs on some of the American "news".

I tell you who has no credability. Its liars like Stockwell Day, Ezra Lavant, David Frum, and their god father in the media, Conrad Black.

These are all congential liars.

11/13/2007  
Blogger Joe Green:

Oh yes, one last point. My name really is Joe Green, and I am not afraid to publish my opinion in my own name.

which is more than you can say for most of the right wing crazies in Calgary these days.

11/13/2007  
Anonymous ron in kelowna:

Bit of friendly advice, Andrew ---- deal with trolls quickly and forcefully. They can destroy good blogs.

11/13/2007  
Anonymous Anonymous:

" And what they are NOT talking about is "free trade" that has crippled the Canadian Economy while the Mulroney "neocons" were raping the treasury."

Yup, free trade certainly has "crippled" the Canadian econony.
Can't remember what the dollar reached today.

And I live in B.C. That damn free trade has crippled the econonmy out west so bad you can't find workes anymore.

Damn free trade.

Horny Toad

11/13/2007  
Anonymous Anonymous:

Jim Roache: Reading your attempt to sermon is like stepping into dog poo--no big deal, but a little unpleasant. You have the brain of a CBC editorial writer.

I'm well aware of the dreadful CBC news "reporting" and the equally loathsome CRTC that originally denied the Fox News Channel to broadcast in Canada. Their concept of freedom of speech is as shallow as the end of the gene pool where they were hatched.

Joe Green: Reading your post is like shaking a walnut the size of a melon with just a dried pea rattling around inside it. You have the lefty language down pat (lowest unemployment rate in 33 years + strong currency = destroyed economy), but it’s more of a mindless recitation, like a dumb savant parrot or something.

Mr Kennedy

11/14/2007  
Blogger hunter:

Did NONE of you notice the DATE of Andrew's post???

February 25, 2004

DUH! Well seeing as the Mulroney thing is 15 years old, I guess a 4 year old post is nothing to you!

2/14/2008